Wednesday, 27 November 2013

The Truth is I'm Critical and Proud of it!

You're so critical!  You have no grace or love.  Do these statements sound familiar?  They do to me.  I've been on the receiving end of these lines quite a few times.  Usually, these statements arise from an individual who has elevated a celebrity pastor/author/teacher to the point of infallibility.  They resent anyone who might force them to look at this "Christian" celebrity in an honest light.  As long as the celebrity gets their theology right 75% of the time then who am I to judge that individual?

This is flawed thinking and I'll use a real life example to explain why.  I went to college to get my Diploma of Nursing quite a few years ago now.  In my college program, I was taught to use critical thinking skills.  Each time I assessed a patient, I had to make sure that I didn't overlook any of their symptoms.  It was my job to make sure that I was giving the physician all the important health data about the patient.  Now, what if I'd only given the doctor 75% of the correct health data about the patient?  What if I'd overlooked 25% of the patient's symptoms?  This would be a grave error.  It is possible that the patient could have died.  My competency as a nurse is dependent on my ability to be critical and to judge my patient's symptoms.

As Christians we should be competent in our ability to divide between truth and error.  We should be able to decide if something is false or even heresy.  God's standard of Truth - His Holy and Inspired Word - should be our sword to cut a line between truth and error.  Therefore, it should offend you when you hear your favourite "Christian" pastor/author/teacher do any of the following:

  1. Describe pornographic divinations and attribute them to the Holy Spirit.
  2. Participate in lectio divina.
  3. Be open to the gap theory and/or theistic evolution.
  4. Quote Catholic mystics in their books.
  5. Twist Scripture in any way, shape, or form to make it about them.
If you choose to overlook these errors (I just named a few) then you are helping these celebrity "Christians" murder the truth.  Does that sound harsh?  Well if I offered you a drink that had 75% water and 25% arsenic and you drank it then I would be committing murder.  I'm sure that I would be held accountable for the crime of murder.  Do you think a jury would be merciful to me?  No!  These celebrities need to be held accountable for their blatant crimes against God's Holy and Inspired Word.  To ignore or support their error is beyond my understanding as a Christian.  It is to accept and propagate their poison.

2 Timothy 2:14 - 17a  "Remind them of these things, charging them before the Lord not to strive about words to no profit, to the ruin of the hearers.  Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.  But shun profane and idle babblings, for they will increase more ungodliness.  And their message will spread like cancer..."  (taken from the MacArthur Study Bible NKJV)

Monday, 4 November 2013

Reflections from Strange Fire


Recently, I attended the Strange Fire Conference at Grace Community Church in California.  The conference was very well done.  My husband and I felt extremely welcomed and enjoyed ourselves so much.  They were even kind enough to serve a luncheon just for Canadians so we had the opportunity to spend time with some of our countrymen.  Over 700 people from the church served us and we are so thankful for them.

Each speaker taught me so much and held to the truth of Scripture.
Here are some thoughts and reflections that I want to share from the conference:

  1. According to John MacArthur, the biggest problem in the church today is a lack of discernment.  I would totally agree with him.  Lately, I've discovered almost a willful ignorance on the part of some Christians.  Many who don't even want to know the truth about a "celebrity" pastor/author/speaker.  They refuse to be good Bereans and they hide behind their fabricated and worldly idea of unity and grace.  Truth is going to divide. 
  2. Worship of God is a very serious undertaking.  The most serious crimes against God occur in corrupt worship. In Exodus 32, we have an example of corrupt worship when Aaron fashioned a golden calf.  This was a false representation of the True God.  Anytime we engage in corrupt worship we are committing a crime against God.  We must be careful to ensure that the theology behind our music, our sermons, and our worship practices is Biblical.  John MacArthur stated that "the theology of the charismatic movement follows their music and will enter the church in that way."  He specifically mentioned the bands Hillsong and Jesus Culture.
  3. There can't be 2 streams of revelation.  It must be Scripture alone.  This is one of the solas that was fought for by the reformers.  The charismatic movement was in the Roman Catholic church before it even came into Protestantism.  The Holy Spirit will only work in accordance with the Word.  He inspired the Holy Word He will only work in unity with it.  If you are expecting to receive personal revelation from God than you are saying that Jesus wasn't the full revelation.  People want what is new.  But if it is new than it isn't true.
  4. Miracles were rare in the Bible.  Charismatics seem to expect the miraculous to occur everyday. In the Bible, there were only 3 primary eras of miracles.  The first era occurred during the lifetimes of Moses and Joshua.  This was about 65 years long.  The second era occurred during the lifetimes of Elijah and Elisha.  This was about 65 years long.  The third era occurred during the lifetimes of Christ and His apostles.  This was about 70 years long.  For approximately 200 years God empowered men to do miracles.  These were done to affirm that the words these men spoke were from God.
  5. The difference between miracles and God's providence was made clear to me.  A miracle is an extraordinary work of God that goes against the laws of nature.  Its purpose is to authenticate the person and their message.  God's providence is that God is involved in all the details of our lives.  God works all things together for good therefore He is working in our lives. (Phil. 2:13)  God might use a spontaneous thought in our heads for His glory.  This doesn't mean that your thought is inspired.  Christians who fall into following the voice in their heads will end up in disaster. (Prov. 28:26)
  6. The work of the Holy Spirit is essentially to point us to Christ and to cause us to become more like Christ.  He produces in us a desire to become a slave of the Lord Jesus Christ.  The wiggling, gibberish, and phony healings of the Charismatic movement do nothing to point us to Christ.  They are also nothing new.  In fact these types of ecstatic experiences can be found in many religions including Islam, Hinduism, Catholicism, and Mormonism.  It has been recorded that at the dedication of the Mormon temple in 1831 there were charismatic experiences taking place.
  7. My most favourite part of the whole conference might seem strange to those who aren't aware of my background.  This has been a tough year for my family and me.  We left our church after 12 years of membership because their theology changed.  They became indoctrinated with Keswick theology through a group called Life Action Ministries.  This group believes that there are 2 types of Christians.  Carnal Christians and Sanctified Christians.  According to them, a Christian can slip from his/her sanctified state by sinning.  Therefore in order to return to their sanctified state they must experience revival.  This is where LAM comes in.  They will help you "work" your way back to your sanctified state.  Anyway, this "ministry" is constantly wanting revival of America and the world.  John MacArthur made a statement that encouraged me so much.  He said "If you are praying for revival, wake up, reformed theology is everywhere." 
It's true.  We have so much access to the Truth.  We have an infinite number of sermons available at our fingertips.  There are countless theology books available on Kindle. We need to study the Scriptures diligently so that we can know what is true and what is false.  The Charismatic movement doesn't want to be examined.  They turn discernment into iniquity and attack sound doctrine.  Truth matters and we have a huge responsibility given to us to discern and test all things. (1John 4:1)

Tuesday, 18 June 2013

The Deep Dark Hole of Discernment!

Have you fallen into the deep dark hole of discernment yet?  I'm afraid that I have. I've actually found it to be quite illuminating.  My eyes have been opened to the false teachers and teachings that have entered evangelicalism.  I've spent some time investigating discernment blogs.  I appreciate the efforts of their authors to put information regarding questionable and false teachings all together in one place.  This allows me to quickly view the information and come to my own conclusions.  The discernment blogs that I read always include web links to support their conclusions.

Yet the growing trend is a venomous hatred for these blogs among many in evangelicalism.  I'd like to explore the reasons behind this hatred.  After all, God's Word instructs us to "test all things; hold fast to what is good." (1 Thess. 5:21)  In Job 28, we are given an interesting perspective on wisdom.  Wisdom is to be searched for like one would mine for gold or precious gems.

Why does this hatred towards these blogs exist?  I think there are a few reasons.  First of all, there is a great push in the secular world towards tolerance.  Everyone's ideas or views are legitimate and valid.  We should be tolerant and non-judgmental.  I think that this has seeped into evangelicalism.  It appears as though any "Christian" author who is deemed worthy by a publishing company should be esteemed unquestioningly by evangelicalism.  Anyone who fills a pulpit, has a show on TBN, or comes out publicly with some sort of "radical" idea is God's anointed and shouldn't be scrutinized by the lowly sheep.

The Bible instructs us to test all things and to search the Scriptures as the Bereans did in Acts 17:11.  The Bereans searched the Scriptures to see if what Paul and Silas had shared was the truth.  They held Paul and Silas up to scrutiny! 

The second reason for the hatred of discernment blogs arises from spiritual pride.  Many in evangelicalism do not believe that they could ever be deceived.  They believe that they would be able to recognize a false teacher or teaching without any difficulty.  But we know from the Bible that Satan is able to disguise himself as an angel of light (2 Cor. 11:13-15).  Our Lord Jesus Christ also admonishes us to take care that we are not deceived (Matt. 24:4,23-25). 

Lastly, I believe a major reason for the hatred of discernment blogs comes from our offering of praise to our favourite speakers/authors/pastors.  In evangelicalism, so many leaders are given worship and praise.  In the eyes of their followers they can do no wrong.  Even when their followers are shown that their leader has fallen into error they deny it and turn on those that have pointed out the error.  The only one who is deserving of our praise and worship is God alone.  He alone is never-changing.  All others are at risk of falling into error.

Discernment blogs are a tool to be used with discernment!  It is important to insure that the blog is backing up their statements with web links so that you can investigate for yourself.  It is also imperative to note whether or not the blog appears to have a vendetta against a certain speaker/author/pastor.  Also if the speaker/author/pastor has repented of their error than the blog should note that to its' readers.

I am thankful for the gift of discernment.  I pray for continued wisdom daily.  I will continue to use discernment blogs wisely and insure that they hold up to the ultimate test of Scripture.

Friday, 2 September 2011

The Truth about the Threat to the Doctrine of Imputation

"What  can wash away my sins?  Nothing but the blood of Jesus.  What can make me whole again?  Nothing but the blood of Jesus."  This old hymn is of course describing the beauty of the doctrine of Imputation.  The truth that while we were sinners God attributed our sins to Jesus and gave Him all the punishment that we deserved.  He then attributed Christ's righteousness to us and gave us every blessing Christ deserved.  This "Great Exchange" is the blessed hope of every believer. (2Cor. 5:21)

There are many threats to the doctrine of Imputation.  But one in particular may come as a surprise to many of us.  It comes from its most fervent supporters.  The threat comes from us.  You see we often give lip service to the doctrine of Imputation but rely on our works.  Our default position as sinners is works-righteousness.  That is why all the religions of the world rely on works for salvation except for Christianity.

The sin of works-righteousness is creeping into mainstream evangelicalism.  It may have even crept into your own life.  I know that I have seen it in mine.  Let's say that I have a really bad day.  I fight with my husband and I yell at my kids.  Then everything starts going wrong; my van breaks down and my basement floods.  I begin to think that I as a saved individual have become unacceptable to God.  I am threatening the doctrine of imputation with this thought pattern.  I am thinking in my heart that there is something that I can do to make myself acceptable to God.  As though God needs a little help in order to forgive me of my sin.

Out of this type of thinking is born legalism.  I may decide to do something to improve my standing with God.  I wake up one morning and determine in my heart to serve my husband and children that day with a good attitude.  That day everything goes right; my husband gets a raise and the children clean the whole house without being asked.  I figure that God has deemed me acceptable and is looking favourably upon me.  Somehow my works have helped me continue my right standing with God.

Of course this type of thinking is completely incorrect.  There is absolutely nothing we can do to make ourselves acceptable to God.  There is no sliding scale of sin with God.  In Romans 4:5-8, Paul makes it clear the imputation of righteousness to us through Christ is completely apart from any human work.  Christ's blood has washed away all my sins whether they are in the past, present, or future.  As Christians we need to embrace this doctrine wholeheartedly.

We need to realize that we are pleasing to God based on Christ's righteousness alone being imputed to us.  We do not need to somehow work to continue to attain this righteousness.  If we do sin we can pray and ask God for His forgiveness.  1John 1:9 "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness."

Unfortunately, self-righteousness and works-righteousness will continue to creep up in our Christian circles.  The important thing is to recognize it in our own lives and as Christians we shouldn't give it a foothold.  We need to lean fully on the doctrine of Imputation and remember - "What can wash away my sins?  Nothing (absolutely nothing) but the blood of Jesus."  Do I hear an Amen?

Monday, 22 August 2011

Does God Spreak Audibly to His People Anymore? (The trend of personal revelation)

If you've been in Christian circles long enough you will inevitably hear the following statements: God spoke to me;  God told me; I heard God say...  These statements normally send a chill down my spine and not in a good way.  Most of the time these Christians are just using a turn of phrase.  To them it really means that the Holy Spirit may have convicted them of something through the Word or perhaps in hindsight they note God's hand in a decision they have made.  But some Christians actually think that they have heard the audible voice of God.  Therefore, they believe that they have received personal revelation.
This personal revelation is especially being seen in the emergent church but it is spilling over into the mainstream evangelical church.  The main reasons I have a problem with personal revelation are as follows:
1)  Satan has the capability of posing as an angel of light.  In other words, he is a counterfeiter.  The voice that you hear could be that deceiver or one of his demons. (2Cor 11:14) 
2) The canon of the Bible is closed.  Therefore any revelation you are receiving should be included in the Bible.  Yet the Bible includes a curse for those who would add or take away from the Biblical canon. (Rev 22:18,19)
3) Scripture is sufficient and the final word of authority for any Christian. It alone is our infallible rule of practice and faith. (2Tim. 3:16,17)
It has also been shown in times past that personal revelation has led to numerous cults or sects including Mormonism (personal revelation of Joseph Smith) and Seventh Day Adventism (the visions of Ellen White).  If someone claims to have heard from God, it is hard for many to dispute their claims.  Who can argue with the words of God?  Many televangelists use this in order to reel in vast amounts of cash from undiscerning people.
I can't stress enough that Scripture is sufficient for us.  God gave us His Words already, we should be reading them instead of waiting for some extra-Biblical experience.


Sunday, 21 August 2011

Crazy Love/ Francis Chan Book Review (Trend of Austerity)

First of all, I found this book to be a difficult read.  It was written in a choppy manner that left me at some points quite confused.  I agree with Francis on very few ideas.  These include the awesomeness of God, the attributes of God, and the wonders of his creation.  The one or two times that Francis mentions salvation by faith in Christ alone through grace alone is another area that he and I agree.  Although I think that he has doubts about this doctrine which I will explain further.  Sadly, there is little else in this book that would allow me to be in agreement with his ideas. 

If I hadn't ordered this book on my Kindle it would be resting in my garbage can right now.  Francis does not handle scripture rightly and he has such a poor exegesis of major passages that he uses to underpin this book.  He does not give credit to any concordance or Bible commentary in his bibliography and I don't believe that this is something that was overlooked.  I honestly don't believe he used these tools.  He also quotes from people who are definitely unsaved as though they are Christians and actually have something to say to God's people for their edification.  He also esteems highly the works of those who dabble in mysticism, monasticism, and the emergent movement.

Let me start by examining his preface.  Francis believes that "By surrendering yourself totally to God's purposes, He will bring you the most pleasure in this life and the next."  He never really explains what pleasure we will receive in this life and I believe that the cost of following Christ results in pain and not pleasure.  The Bible tells us that we will be persecuted. (John 15:18-20)  Francis also wishes for us to become "giving churches" so that we can alleviate the suffering in the world and change the reputation of His bride in America.  First of all the mission of any Christian is to share the gospel and pray that the Holy Spirit will work through us to bring the unsaved into a right relationship with God through Jesus' atoning work on the cross.  The suffering in the world is a direct result of sin.  Which should we be more concerned about?  The sin or the suffering?  Jesus came to seek and save that which was lost - should we not follow in his footsteps?  As for the reputation of the church in America/Canada, should we be concerned with what the world thinks of us?  I think not.  They will always hate us.

Francis begins his butchering of scripture in Chapter 2.  1 Cor. 10:31 "So whatever you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God."  This, according to Francis means that you need to get over yourself.  Actually, this verse is discussing Christian liberty.  When it is read in context it is advising Christians not to abuse their liberties to make a brother stumble.  This would bring dishonour to God.  In the next chapter, Francis explains that we are Christ's inheritance.  He does this using the verse Eph. 1:18  "the eyes of your understanding being enlightened;  that you may know what is the hope of His calling, what are the riches of His inheritance in the saints."  Actually, Paul is talking about our inheritance that is ours in Christ.  Not vice versa - this can also be noted in Eph. 1:11 "In Him we have obtained an inheritance, being predestined according to the purpose of Him who works all things according to the counsel of His will..."

I would consider chapter four to be one of the most confusing in the entire book.  The lukewarm churchgoers that he describes cannot be believers.  Although he holds them to account for their actions like they are believers.  Throughout this chapter Francis tells us not to assume that we are good soil. " Now, all those who call themselves believers should test themselves to see that they are in the faith." (2 Cor. 13:5)  But then he starts a certain line of questioning which seems to approve of works righteousness.  He asks, "Are you satisfied with being godly enough to get yourself to heaven, or to look good in comparison to others?"  Quite frankly this is very strange indeed.  No one is actually godly enough to get to heaven.  Only through repentance and trusting in the atoning sacrifice of Christ can one be saved (the doctrine of imputation).   Any works that we do after we are saved are only through the Holy Spirit working through us to make us more like Christ (the doctrine of sanctification).
In chapter five, he finally clarifies that lukewarm churchgoers are not Christians.  This is the chapter where those who have wealth start taking a beating.  Francis says that "whether we acknowledge our wealth or not, being rich is a serious disadvantage spiritually."  Really?  That statement puzzles me as there are many devoted followers in the Bible who were wealthy.  Think of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, David, and Solomon from the Old Testament.  In the New Testament there is Joseph of Arimathea, Mary and Martha and Lazarus, Philemon, Barnabas, Cornelius, Lydia, and the Ethiopian that Phillip baptizes.  Francis goes on to use a quote from William Wilberforce, "Prosperity hardens the heart."  Toward what?  I suspect this has to do with the subject of slavery and that many of the wealthy of England were prosperous because of it.  They had hardened their hearts against the atrocities of slavery because their wealth depended on it.
Predictably, Francis goes to the encounter that Jesus has with the rich young ruler (Luke 18 : 22-24)  This young man wanted to inherit eternal life.  Jesus knew that this young man worshipped wealth.  He had money and he loved the money. (Please keep in mind that you can be poor and still love money)  Jesus decided to test him and asked him to sell all that he had and give it to the poor.  Now Jesus is not setting up some new parameters for salvation.  He is not teaching salvation by philanthropy.  He was demanding that the young man give Him first place in his life.  Well the rich young ruler walks away and Jesus makes a statement about how hard it is for those who trust in riches to enter the kingdom of God (Mark 10:24)  (Keep in mind it is those who trust in riches).  Jesus goes on to say that it is easier for a camel to go through an eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.  Here Jesus is highlighting the fact that it is impossible for anyone to be saved by merit.  The Jews believed that a wealthy person could purchase redemption through the giving of alms, sacrifices, and offerings.  Also it was commonly thought at this time that wealth was an indication of God's approval and therefore the wealthy were the most likely to attain heaven.  Jesus is destroying these beliefs by making it known that salvation is entirely the gracious work of God.  So when the disciples ask Him in Luke 18:26 " Who then can be saved?", He answers "The things that are impossible with men are possible with God."  Jesus is showing that no man merits salvation it is a gift from God.  This verse does not indicate that the wealthy are not able to be saved or that to be wealthy is a sin.
From here Francis takes yet another passage of scripture out of context.  He moves on to Luke 19 and the story of the rich tax collector named Zaccheus.  Francis considers this proof that the impossible has just become possible (Luke 18:27).  A rich man has become saved.  Zaccheus was repentant of his sin.  He had made his wealth through ill-gotten gain and he knew it.  He decided to make amends for his sin by paying back people he had wronged four-fold.  This was the fruit of his conversion and not the condition of his salvation.
Next Francis takes us to Malachi where Israel is apparently offering God leftovers.  In fact Israel has become a wicked nation that hasn't kept God's laws and could actually care less about pleasing God.  I would have to call them unbelievers.  Francis goes on to say that God doesn't want their worship in Malachi 1 because it is leftovers.  No, He doesn't want their worship because they are unrepentant sinners.  Francis says that God measures our lives by how we love.  Well I would go further than that.  I would say that he would measure our lives by our outward fruit and that indicates our inward condition.  He is able to measure whether or not we are walking in the Spirit by the fruits of the Spirit manifested in us (Gal. 5:22-26). 
I am unclear as to whether Francis believes one can lose their salvation.  On one hand he says that you don't have to work your way to Jesus but on the other hand he says "that pursuing Christ is like swimming upstream.  When we stop swimming or actively following Him we automatically begin to be swept downstream."    Well, I praise God that He holds out a hand through the power of the Holy Spirit for us to hold onto or under that theology all of us would be swept downstream.  At this point Francis throws in a quote for our edification.  This quote is presumably from a believer - right?  Wrong!  It is from Henri Nouwen who was a Roman Catholic priest.  Not only that he was into mysticism and was a homosexual.
Near the end of this chapter, Francis says that Jesus said that the road is narrow and few will actually find it.  This is true.  But then he drops the bombshell that even fewer of these people on the narrow way will be rich.  Huh?  What does wealth have to do with it?  Then just when he has you totally confused he throws in a little fear and doubt.  He ends the chapter by saying "don't assume you are the good soil;  don't assume you are one of the few on the narrow way."  Yikes!  Sounds ominous and really could make a true believer doubt their salvation.  Francis seems to think that when it comes to being a Christian it's best to never assure anyone that they are in the faith.
On to chapter six where Francis takes yet another passage of scripture out of context.  We return to Malachi.  This time it is Chapter 3:10.  God invites His people , the Israelites, to test Him.  If they will honour Him by giving Him that which is due in a show of true repentance then he will shower them with abundance, protect them from locusts and they would be the delight of the nations.  He was allowing them to test Him - a one time offer.  This was not setting a precedent for us.  In fact in Luke 3:12 Jesus is being tempted by Satan and says "It is said, You shall not put the Lord your God to the test."
Now Francis decides to open an invitation for calamity.  He says "If you really want to experience God's supernatural provision, then do as He says.  Test Him.  Give more than you can manage, and see how He responds."  Huh?  What if He has already given us supernatural provision?  Our homes, our jobs, our material possessions, - our very lives!!   I guess this isn't enough - now we have to test Him.  What about being thankful for the provisions we already have and being a good steward with what we've been given.(Luke 16:10-12)
In chapter seven Francis decides to expound Matthew 25:42-43, 45.  This passage is talking about the final judgment where the wicked are told that even though they had the means they did nothing to help the least of Christ's followers.  These wicked people are unrepentant sinners who never knew Christ and rejected His calling.  Next Francis turns to 1 John 3 : 16-20.  These verses talk about what true love is and that it is about sacrificial giving to another Christian's needs and helping those who need it.  This is appropriate.  But then he goes to Luke 12:33 where Jesus says to "Sell your possessions and give to the needy..." Believers in the early church did sell their possessions to help the poorer brethren.  But this verse should not be taken as a prohibition against all earthly possessions.  Peter's words to Ananias in Acts 5:4 make it clear that the selling of one's possessions is optional.
Further in the chapter, Francis encourages us to "trust Him (God) so completely that we are unafraid to put ourselves in situations where we will be in trouble if He doesn't come through.  Once again he is inviting us to test God.  He extols a man who gave his house to the church and moved back into his parent's home.  He also praises a friend who upon losing his job gave more to God rather than less.  But what if some well meaning Christian disposes of all his worldly goods and is in financial trouble?  He can't pay his creditors and claims bankruptcy.  What kind of witness is this?  Francis wants us to look at ourselves to determine what a life wholly surrendered to God would look like.  Apparently serving in the Church, working faithfully at a job, raising a family, being a godly spouse, a faithful steward of our possessions, a giver of time, money etc. isn't radical enough for Francis.  Why do I say this?   Because the stories of the people he celebrates in the next chapter do not describe the average working "Joe Christian".  You know the ones that actually support the missionaries that he mentions.  The ones that make their ministry possible.
Chapter nine contains the stories of people that Francis feels are living radically enough for his tastes.  This includes the dubious story of a man named "Rings".  Apparently, Rings is a chain-smoker who lives in the cab of his pick-up in downtown Ocean Beach, California.  He receives a monthly check (from the government?)  which he uses to make meals for his fellow homeless buddies.  Francis says, "He tells them that God is the One who told him to feed others with his money,(Rings is receiving personal revelation) and it's because God loves each of them."  Francis goes on to say, "This man gives everything he has to others - literally everything - because he knows he has nothing that wasn't given to him by God."  I would venture to disagree as "Rings" definitely keeps back some smokes money.  Also, if this is a welfare cheque than the American people are actually the ones giving the money.  If "Rings" doesn't earn it, than he's not really sacrificing a thing. 
Another person that Francis extols is a man by the name of Shane Claiborne.  He's been described an a dreadlocked Mother Theresa.  He wrote a book called the "Irresistible Revolution"  and has founded a group of new monks called the Simple Way.  It is a form of new monasticism.  As you can guess, Shane gives away just about everything he has.  Not only that, Shane is a huge supporter of mysticism.  His mentor is Tony Campolo. Shane believes that just because someone might experience God a different way i.e. Islam, doesn't mean that they are going to Hell.  By the way, that book that he wrote was co-authored by a man named Jonathan Wilson - Hartgrove.  Jonathan is a leader in the new monastic movement and was a speaker at the Wild Goose Festival in North Carolina earlier this year.  At this festival there was music, yoga, liberal talks and the embracing of gays and lesbians. 
Francis kicks off  chapter 10 with a witty quote from Annie Dillard.  Annie Dillard is an award winning author who has used Hinduism, Buddhism and even Eskimo religions in her writings. She says she either has no religion or many religions.  Definitely not saved. Also in chapter 10, Francis puts selling possessions on par with baptism, repentance, and sharing the gospel.  Francis says:  "After the apostle Peter preached on the day of Pentecost, people were cut to the heart and said ... 'Brothers, what shall we do?'" (Act 2:37)  The first church responded with immediate action: repentance, baptism, selling possessions, sharing the gospel.  But the people were actually cut to heart regarding their sin.  Peter answered their question (what shall we do?) by saying that they must repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus. (Acts 2:38)  Later on in the chapter (Acts 2: 44,45)  do the people sell their possessions to assist the poorer brethren.   The text further indicates that they did not sell their principal residences but sold extra land and possessions.  They gave what was feasible and didn't leave themselves destitute. 
Francis doesn't really give any clear direction as to where the average Christian is supposed to go from here. I'm left with the question "What's radical enough for Francis?"  Obviously, the average Christian life is not godly enough for him.  He seems to promote works righteousness and esteems the giving of possessions above all else.  Even to the point of praising people that do not believe in the true gospel e.g. Shane Claiborne.  He also quotes unbelievers, including a homosexual.  I speculate that Francis is in a state of spiritual crisis where he isn't really sure what he believes.  Unfortunately, he is trying to bring true believers down with him.  I encourage all believers to rest in the doctrine of imputation.  This sets us apart from other religions who rely on works for salvation.  Working in the local church, being a faithful steward of your money, sharing the gospel with others, raising godly children, loving your spouse, and honouring God in all you do is radical and crazy enough. 

The Resources I used are as follows:
Crazy Love by author Francis Chan, The NKJV John MacArthur Bible, The ESV Bible, and The Big Book of Bible Difficulties by authors Norman Geisler and Thomas Howe.